Global Anti-LGBTIQ+ Networks in Africa

Across Sub-Saharan Africa, a sharp rise in anti LGBTIQ+ laws, rhetoric, and targeted attacks is unfolding, but this trend is far from spontaneous. A new executive summary from Justice for Prosperity, commissioned by IPPF, introduces critical findings on how political, religious, and ideological networks are coordinating across borders to fuel hostility and roll back fundamental rights. The report draws on extensive research and intelligence to map how these alliances shape legislation, influence public opinion, and weaken democratic institutions.

The summary highlights how international actors are strategically using narratives about culture, sovereignty, and morality to justify restrictive legislation. It also shows how disinformation, digital mobilisation, high level convenings, and well resourced advocacy groups create an ecosystem where anti rights agendas can spread quickly. While the focus is on LGBTIQ+ rights, the analysis makes clear that these same forces impact broader issues including sexual and reproductive health and rights, freedom of expression, and the space in which civil society operates.

This publication serves as an early glimpse into a complex and rapidly evolving landscape where global agendas translate into local consequences. It is intended to equip advocates, policymakers, and partners with the context needed to recognise emerging patterns and anticipate future risks. You can download the executive summary below.

Table of Contents

Read more articles

Screenshot 2025-10-29 at 09.10.42

Hoe worden verkiezingen in Europa beïnvloed?

Verkiezingen zijn een aantrekkelijk doelwit voor zowel buitenlandse als binnenlandse beïnvloeding en desinformatiecampagnes. Buitenlandse informatiemanipulatie en inmenging (FIMI) kunnen de integriteit van verkiezingen ondermijnen door publieke opinie te manipuleren, stemgedrag te beïnvloeden en het vertrouwen in het verkiezingsproces aan te tasten. Hier schrijven wij over in ons laatste rapport.
1761299134259

antidemocratisch gedrag of niet

Hier klopt iets niet! De Democratie Monitor bestempelt de weigering van Volt Nederland om met het Forum voor Democratie in debat te gaan ten onrechte als antidemocratisch. Niet het weigeren van debat holt de democratie uit, maar het legitimeren van actoren die norm-en-feitenerosie als strategie hanteren. Waarom vinden wij dat?

media post

JfP in the media

At JfP our mission is to investigate and uncover subversive threats to our democracies. We do this through multidisciplinary and multilayered research into anti-democratic actors, which we post in the form of detailed reports, investigations or news. However, we do not always post our findings and investigations. In some situations,